Video on this page

History Alfa Romeo Alfetta


Magnification

German version

Alfetta
EngineIn-line four-cylinder
Displacement (Bore * stroke)1779 cm³ (80 mm * 88,5 mm) (-1975)
1570 cm³ (78 mm * 82,0 mm) (1975-)
1779 cm³ (80 mm * 88,5 mm) (1975-)
1962 cm³ (84 mm * 88,5 mm) (1977-)
Compressin ratio9,5/9,0/9,5/9,0 : 1
Engine controlDOHC
Torque167 Nm at 4400 rpm (-1975)
149 Nm at 4000 rpm (-1975)
167 Nm at 4400 rpm (1975-)
176 Nm at 4000 rpm (1977-)
Performance90 kW (122 hp) at 5500 rpm (-1975)
79 kW (108 hp) at 5600 rpm (1975-)
87 kW (118 hp) at 5300 rpm (1975-)
96 kW (130 hp) at 5400 rpm (1977-)
DesignFront engine - transaxle-principle
Suspension frontDouble wishbones on torsion bar springs
Suspension rearDe Dion-axle, watt linage
BrakesDiscs, back inside
Wheelbase2510 mm
Tyres185 HR 14
DesignCentro Stile
Tank capacity49 liter
Kerb weightApprox. 1050 kg + driver
Top speed180/175/180/185 km/h
Construction period1972 - 1984


The name comes from the glorious racing series 158/159


In principle, the suspension of Alfa Romeos has not changed in the rear since decades. Now, here is a radical cut. Not only the rear independent suspension is sought, but also a more even weight distribution. Consequently, the gearbox and clutch are moved to the rear under the (lifted) boot, keeping the additional load for the synchronizer rings low. And to reduce the non-spring mounted masses even further, the rear disc braking likewise moves inwards.

Also the front axle changed. Indeed, the arms are kept, but torsion bar springs are substituted for the coil springs. The reasoning behind this is to make the engine compartment suitably for the eight-cylinder engine of the Montreal. However, due to the oil-prize crisis in 1973/74, the eight-cylinder was never mounted into the Alfetta.

The Alfetta clearly improved in terms of design as compared to its predecessors. Unfortunately, this does not hold true for the shape. Especially Alfa lovers are not particularly fond of the indeed modern shape, yet without any charm. Especially the rear is subject to criticism. The boot lid is raised a bit, because of the higher bottom, otherwise, the angular, non-aerodynamic bodywork is not altered significantly, and the rear is rather disimproved. The same is true for the rust protection, but, actually, for the slightly later models.



Should you spot any errors on this page, please click here ...